Trump’s Potential Unilateral Tariff Authority: Impacts and Reforms Needed

January 16, 2025

President-elect Donald Trump’s intention to impose a broad range of tariffs as soon as he takes office has sparked significant debate. His proposed economic policies, particularly the imposition of tariffs, raise critical questions about the extent of executive power to implement such measures without the traditional checks and balances. This article explores the potential economic and institutional impacts of rapid unilateral tariff implementation, shedding light on both the challenges and the necessary reforms to ensure a balanced approach.

Trump’s Ambitious Tariff Agenda

From the outset, Trump has proposed an ambitious tariff agenda, including a general blanket tariff of 10-20% on all imported goods, an additional tariff ranging between 60-100% on goods from China, and a 100% tariff on products from BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) should they attempt to undermine the U.S. dollar’s status as the global reserve currency. Additionally, a substantial 25% tariff on all products imported from Mexico and Canada is part of his sweeping measures. These proposals raise crucial questions regarding the speed and authority with which they could be implemented by the executive branch.

Due to an expansive array of legislative tools available to the executive branch regarding tariffs, Trump does indeed possess the authority to impose these tariffs quickly. This unique circumstance extends to tariffs unlike other economic policies that involve substantial checks and balances. The unusual concentration of power regarding tariff imposition within the executive branch is largely a result of decisions made by Congress to delegate this authority. Historically, Congress has opted to relinquish its control over tariff decisions, favoring quick executive action over the prolonged legislative process.

Historical Context and Legislative Delegation

Tariff imposition and adjustments have traditionally been managed through executive proclamations rather than through the legislative process, which involves elaborate vetting by the House Ways and Means and Senate Finance Committees. The legislative process usually encompasses extensive study and public discourse, making it impractical for the introduction of new taxes or tariffs on immediate notice. Unlike many other regulatory actions, tariffs can be swiftly imposed without undergoing the same rigorous checks and balances, largely due to historical decisions made by Congress to delegate tariff authority to the executive branch.

The article highlights two primary legal avenues for such executive actions. Firstly, various Trade Acts enacted between the 1930s and 1970s grant the executive branch the power to declare tariff rates intended to protect American workers and consumers from unfair trade practices. This authority was notably exercised by President Trump in his first term to impose tariffs on products such as solar panels and washing machines. However, using this authority necessitates initiating an investigation by the Department of Commerce or the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative—procedures that include a 30-60 day notice-and-comment period for public input. These required procedural steps can significantly delay the immediate imposition of the proposed tariffs to protect American industries.

The International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)

The second and faster route involves the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977. This act grants the executive branch powers to address unusual and extraordinary peacetime threats to national security, foreign policy, or the economy. Trump’s previous use of the IEEPA in May 2019 to threaten escalating tariffs on Mexican imports exemplifies this approach. Although he retracted this action following Mexico’s commitment to immigration controls, the IEEPA bypasses virtually all regulatory checks and balances, delivering a rapid execution of new tariffs. This fast-track method positions the executive branch with extraordinary powers to manage tariffs without the usual scrutiny.

Invoking the IEEPA might be Trump’s most plausible route to enforce new tariffs on day one. However, this path garners significant legal scrutiny. Critics argue its inappropriateness for imposing tariffs intended to address broad economic goals, a sentiment that emerged during its proposed use against Mexico in 2019. These concerns are poised to re-emerge with suggestions to use the IEEPA for broader tariffs against both Mexico and Canada. Critics highlight the potential for misuse of this powerful tool and the need to re-evaluate its application in the context of routine economic measures versus genuine threats to national security.

The Need for Reform and Congressional Oversight

President-elect Donald Trump’s plan to implement a wide range of tariffs promptly upon taking office has ignited considerable debate. His proposed economic policies, especially the enforcement of tariffs, bring forth critical questions regarding the executive branch’s authority to enact such measures without traditional checks and balances. This article delves into the potential economic and institutional impacts of swiftly and unilaterally implementing tariffs. It highlights the various challenges that could arise from such actions and discusses the necessary reforms to ensure a more balanced and thoughtful approach. By examining these aspects, we gain a deeper understanding of the possible repercussions and the importance of maintaining a system of checks and balances. This balance is crucial to mitigating adverse effects while working towards the intended economic goals. The discussion underscores the need for careful consideration and collaboration to navigate the complexities of imposing tariffs in a manner that fosters economic stability and respects institutional integrity.

Subscribe to our weekly news digest.

Join now and become a part of our fast-growing community.

Invalid Email Address
Thanks for Subscribing!
We'll be sending you our best soon!
Something went wrong, please try again later