Navigating Legal Pitfalls of AI in Software Development

January 31, 2025

As AI technology continues to advance, coding agents are poised to revolutionize software development. These AI coding agents, which are an evolution from AI-based coding assistants, promise to take over significant portions of software creation. However, this technological leap brings with it a host of legal risks, particularly concerning intellectual property (IP) rights, copyright, and licenses. Legal experts emphasize the need for organizations to be vigilant in navigating these potential pitfalls.

The Rise of AI Coding Agents

From Assistants to Agents

AI-based coding assistants have already become a staple for many programmers, helping them write snippets of code more efficiently. The next step in this evolution is the development of AI coding agents capable of producing more extensive software, potentially replacing junior developers. This shift necessitates a closer examination of the output generated by these AI coders to ensure compliance with IP laws. The evolution from simple assistants to more advanced AI coding agents could potentially expedite development times and reduce costs. However, with their increased influence on actual coding output, the potential for legal challenges grows. One must consider if the AI-generated code infringes upon existing works, particularly when the AI has been trained using copyrighted material.

Potential for IP Infringement

The use of AI coding agents raises significant concerns about IP infringement. Lawsuits in the media and entertainment industries have already highlighted issues where AI vendors allegedly used copyrighted material to train their models or replicated copyrighted content in their outputs. Similar challenges could arise in the software industry, where source code is typically private but still vulnerable to infringement claims. The legal implications of IP infringement are significant; unauthorized use of copyrighted material can lead to costly lawsuits and damage to a company’s reputation. Developers and organizations must diligently review AI-generated code to ensure none of it mimics or directly copies works protected by copyright.

Legal Challenges and Considerations

Copyright and Training Data

A critical question in the use of AI coding agents is whether the AI output infringes on existing copyrighted work. The risk of infringement increases if the AI model was trained using copyrighted material. This issue underscores the broader legal debate about whether AI vendors can legally use copyrighted software code for training purposes. If the data used for training includes copyrighted material without proper permissions, the resultant AI-produced code could unintentionally incorporate these elements, leading to potential IP violations.

Michael Word, an IP and IT-focused lawyer at Dykema Gossett, notes the importance of resolving copyright issues at the large-language model level. This suggests that AI vendors must ensure compliance from the ground up. Organizations using AI tools must also examine vendor practices to be aware of how the AI was trained and the potential legal ramifications should an infringement claim arise.

Open-Source Code and Licensing

The inclusion of proprietary or open-source code in AI training data poses additional risks. AI-generated code that mirrors open-source code intended for non-commercial use can lead to accidental license violations. This is particularly problematic as AI cannot distinguish between different licensing terms, potentially exposing organizations to legal challenges. For instance, if open-source code under a non-commercial license is used to train an AI and the generated code is then used in a commercial product, the organization could face significant legal consequences.

Understanding the various licenses that govern software code is crucial. Licenses like GPL, MIT, and Apache come with specific terms and conditions that must be adhered to avoid breaches. If an AI tool inadvertently utilizes code that violates these terms, the consequences can be severe, including the requirement to open-source an entire project.

Mitigation Strategies

Vendor Solutions

To address these risks, vendors like GitHub Copilot and Tabnine are implementing measures to help users navigate potential IP issues. GitHub Copilot, for instance, offers an optional code-referencing filter and a feature to review open-source licenses. Additionally, GitHub provides legal protection to users who enable this filter, covering them under its indemnification policy. This initiative aims to reduce the risk of unintentionally using copyrighted code and provide a safety net for organizations leveraging these tools for development.

Tabnine, another AI coding assistant, has also introduced a code review agent. These measures reflect vendors’ acknowledgment of the potential IP risks and their attempt to offer solutions that aid users in compliance. Despite these vendor solutions, organizations must not rely solely on these tools for IP validation and must implement their own checks and balances.

Organizational Responsibilities

Despite these vendor solutions, the onus remains on organizations to ensure compliance with IP laws. This involves manually checking AI-produced code for copyright infringement and open-source license violations or utilizing specialized services that detect IP infringement. Such proactive measures are essential to mitigate legal risks. Organizations must implement a robust framework for code review that includes thorough audits and routine checks, ensuring all AI-generated output meets legal standards before integrating it into any projects.

Regular communication with legal teams and IP lawyers to understand the evolving landscape of software licensing can also be beneficial. By staying informed about legal precedents and new legislation, organizations can better navigate potential pitfalls and maintain compliance in their software development practices.

The Role of Code Reviews

Importance of Audits

Auditing AI-generated code is crucial to prevent IP violations. Companies should treat AI-generated code with the same scrutiny as human-written code, conducting thorough reviews to identify potential infringements. This approach helps organizations stay compliant and avoid legal pitfalls. It involves verifying code originality, ensuring no part of the generated code replicates existing copyrighted material, or violates open-source licenses.

In addition to legal compliance, comprehensive audits contribute to maintaining code quality and integrity. Organizations can leverage both manual reviews and automated tools to scan for IP issues, enhancing the thoroughness and efficiency of the auditing process. Engaging in this practice regularly helps to safeguard against potential lawsuits and protects the company’s intellectual assets.

Emerging Services

As the demand for AI-generated code increases, so does the need for comprehensive audit services. While some AI platforms offer partial protection, other service providers are likely to emerge, offering detailed audits to detect potential copyright infringements. These services will become increasingly necessary as AI continues to integrate into software development. Given that AI tools are sophisticated and vary in their capabilities, specialist services can provide tailored analysis and mitigation strategies.

Emerging solutions may include AI-based auditing tools specifically designed to detect copied or infringing code, potentially simplifying the review process for organizations. These solutions can act as an additional layer of security, complementing internal review processes. As the field matures, innovations in audit and compliance services will likely evolve to further support organizations in managing the complexities of AI-generated code.

Balancing Innovation and Compliance

Awareness and Vigilance

The actual risk level of using AI coding agents remains uncertain, but organizations must remain vigilant. Large AI vendors might be primary targets for infringement lawsuits, but user organizations are also at risk, especially when using AI-generated code in commercially successful software. Coders need to be aware of their actions and the potential legal implications of using AI tools. Awareness training and guidelines on the use of AI coding assistants can help developers understand the importance of legal compliance and the steps needed to mitigate risks.

Moreover, fostering a culture of continuous education around copyright laws and IP rights within development teams is essential. By equipping developers with the knowledge and tools to recognize and address IP issues, organizations can enhance their overall compliance posture.

Proactive Measures

As AI technology continues to advance, the future of software development is set to be transformed by coding agents. These AI coding agents, an evolution from their predecessors, AI-based coding assistants, are poised to take over substantial parts of software creation. This shift promises greater efficiency and innovation in software design and development. Nevertheless, this significant technological advance isn’t without its challenges, particularly in the realm of legal considerations. Issues concerning intellectual property (IP) rights, copyright, and software licenses are at the forefront of these challenges. Legal experts stress the importance of organizations remaining vigilant as they navigate these potential pitfalls. Implementing proper legal safeguards and being proactive in addressing these concerns will be crucial for companies seeking to leverage AI coding agents effectively while protecting their interests and ensuring compliance with the law. The careful balance between innovation and legal responsibility will shape the successful integration of AI in the software development industry.

Subscribe to our weekly news digest.

Join now and become a part of our fast-growing community.

Invalid Email Address
Thanks for Subscribing!
We'll be sending you our best soon!
Something went wrong, please try again later